evidence
Google reviews in which named clients describe the specific service Navigator performed
| Evidence class | third-party |
|---|---|
| Evidence type | review |
| Source | Google Business Profile for Navigator Multimedia (Kelowna) |
| Accessed | 2026-09-11 |
| Method | All 43 reviews on the listing were loaded and searched for mentions of a named service line. Seven reviews mention one; the five below describe work done for the reviewer's own organization. Two others describe the agency's service menu rather than work received and are excluded from the count. |
| Excerpt | Five named clients describe, in their own words, the service Navigator performed for them. |
| Supports | Navigator Multimedia is a web design and digital marketing agency, Navigator Multimedia provides search engine optimization, Navigator Multimedia provides paid advertising management (Google Ads, Meta), Navigator Multimedia provides brand development and graphic design, Navigator Multimedia provides web design and development |
| Portion supported | Independent, dated, public attestation by named organizations of the specific service line delivered. SEO two attestations, paid advertising two, branding one, web design three. |
| Limitations | Reviews are the reviewer's recollection, not a contract or an invoice. Relative dates are as Google displays them. Reviewers can edit or delete their reviews, so this is a dated observation. One review (Summerland) recommends SEO without stating SEO work was done, and is deliberately not counted. |
| How to reproduce | Search "Navigator Multimedia Kelowna" on Google, open the reviews panel, and read the reviews by the named authors. |
Notes
This record exists because the evidence threshold turns on a distinction the earlier roll-up hid: whether a reviewer describes work done for their own organization, or simply recommends the agency. Only the former counts toward verification. The quotes are reproduced in full sentences so the reader can judge rather than trust the summary.